{"id":728,"date":"2013-12-05T01:02:40","date_gmt":"2013-12-05T01:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/?page_id=728"},"modified":"2025-02-28T19:49:25","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T19:49:25","slug":"cases","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/cases\/","title":{"rendered":"California Employment Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; fullwidth=&#8221;on&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.27.3&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_fullwidth_slider _builder_version=&#8221;4.27.3&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;||||true|false&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;8vw||8vw||true|false&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_slide heading=&#8221;California Employment Cases&#8221; use_bg_overlay=&#8221;on&#8221; bg_overlay_color=&#8221;rgba(0,0,0,0.4)&#8221; use_text_overlay=&#8221;off&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.27.3&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; background_enable_color=&#8221;off&#8221; background_image=&#8221;https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/marin-view-slide-870&#215;2761-NL-restore-denoise-upscale-4x.jpg&#8221; background_enable_image=&#8221;on&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; sticky_transition=&#8221;on&#8221;][\/et_pb_slide][\/et_pb_fullwidth_slider][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; admin_label=&#8221;section&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_row admin_label=&#8221;row&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; background_size=&#8221;initial&#8221; background_position=&#8221;top_left&#8221; background_repeat=&#8221;repeat&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; custom_padding=&#8221;|||&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; custom_padding__hover=&#8221;|||&#8221;][et_pb_text admin_label=&#8221;Text&#8221; module_class=&#8221;with_toggle_content&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.27.3&#8243; background_size=&#8221;initial&#8221; background_position=&#8221;top_left&#8221; background_repeat=&#8221;repeat&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;]<\/p>\n<h3>Current Employment Cases<\/h3>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce419\">\n            Amports - <em>Expense Reimbursement<\/em><em> <\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce419\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <\/p>\n<p>Recinos v. Amports, Inc.<br \/>Contra Costa County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. C24-02244<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees, who have worked for Amports in California allege that they were denied expense reimbursement for the reasonable and necessary use of their personal mobile phones to carry out their job duties.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce51d\">\n             Auto-Chlor System - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce51d\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sablowsky, et al. v. Auto-Chlor System of New York City, Inc., et al.<br \/>US District Court, Northern District of California<br \/>Case No. 23-cv-02555-AGT<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Branch Managers, who have worked for Auto-Chlor System of New York City, Inc., Auto-Chlor System of the Mid South, LLC or Auto-Chlor System of San Diego, allege that they were denied overtime compensation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce5fd\">\n             Auto-Chlor System of Northern California - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce5fd\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ghiorso, et al. v. Auto-Chlor System of Northern California<br \/>Alameda County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. 24CV090505<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Branch Managers, who have worked for Auto-Chlor System of Northern California, Inc. in California, allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce698\">\n             Auto-Chlor System of Washington - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce698\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hernandez, et al. v. Auto-Chlor System of Washington<br \/>Santa Clara County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. 24CV447231<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Branch Managers, who have worked for Auto-Chlor System of Washington, allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce72d\">\n             Blue Bottle Coffee - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce72d\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Greeley, et al. v. Blue Bottle Coffee, LLC<br \/>San Francisco County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. CGC-23-610084<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Caf\u00e9 Leaders, who have worked for Blue Bottle Coffee in California allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal breaks.<\/p>\n<p>This case has settled and a Notice will be sent to eligible class members on March 6, 2025.<b> \u00a0<u><a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">Contact us<\/a><\/u><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\"> <\/a><\/span><\/b>if you have any questions.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce7c3\">\n             Blue Link Wireless - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce7c3\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Gonzalez, et al. v. Blue Link Wireless<br \/>San Francisco County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. CGC-24-614396<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Store Leaders, who have worked for Blue Link Wireless in California allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce851\">\n             Dignity Health - <em>Expense Reimbursement<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce851\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Husted v. Dignity Health<br \/>San Francisco County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. CGC-24-612854<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated Managers, who have worked for Dignity Health in California allege that they were denied expense reimbursement for the reasonable and necessary use of their personal mobile phones and home internet to carry out their job duties.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce8de\">\n             JPMorgan Chase - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce8de\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Su v. JPMorgan Chase Bank<br \/>Sonoma County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. 24CV03516<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated Branch Managers, who have worked for JPMorgan Chase in California allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal and rest breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dce96d\">\n             Mechanics Bank - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dce96d\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dunaway v. Mechanics Bank<br \/>Contra Costa County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. C24-01512<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated Branch Managers, Financial Services Managers, and Banking Service Officers who have worked for Mechanics Bank in California allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal and rest breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dcea24\">\n             Morgan Stanley - <em>Expense Reimbursement<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dcea24\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Kern v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC<br \/>Marin County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. CIV2201383<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated Morgan Stanley employees who incurred reasonable and necessary business expenses as a result of their performance of duties for Morgan Stanley while working from home, allege that they were not reimbursed for these necessary expenses.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dceab2\">\n             Mountain Mike's - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dceab2\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Flores v. Diana Benyamin, Inc., dba Mountain Mike\u2019s Pizza \u2013 Santa Cruz &amp; Mountain Mike\u2019s Pizza-Watsonville<br \/>Santa Cruz County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. 24CV00945<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees who have worked for Mountain Mike\u2019s Pizza \u2013 Santa Cruz and\/or Mountain Mike\u2019s Pizza \u2013 Watsonville allege that they were (1) denied overtime compensation, (2) did not receive uninterrupted meal and rest breaks, (3) did not receive accurate wage statements, (4) were not reimbursed for necessary business expenses, and (5) were not paid all earned wages twice per month.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dceb45\">\n             Patelco Credit Union - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dceb45\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Rhodes, et al. v. Patelco Credit Union<br \/>Alameda County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. 23CV025913<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated Branch Managers who have worked for Patelco Credit Union in California allege that they were denied overtime compensation and failed to receive uninterrupted meal and rest breaks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>To Join the Class<\/strong><br \/>In any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dcebde\">\n             Peet's Coffee - <em>Expense Reimbursement and Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em><em><\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dcebde\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em><\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Marquez, et al. v. Peet\u2019s Coffee<br \/>Marin County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. CIV2201507<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Store Managers, Assistant Store Managers and Store leads who have worked for Peet\u2019s Coffee in California allege that Peet\u2019s failed to reimburse them for expenses relating to the use of their mobile phones to perform work-related tasks, (b) failed to compensate them with minimum wage and overtime compensation for hours spent engaging in work-related communications while working off-the-clock; (c) failed to provide meal and rest breaks as a result of having to use their mobile phones when on break; (d) failed to pay them at their regular rates when paying meal and rest period premiums, overtime premiums, and sick pay premiums; (e) failed to provide accurate, itemized wage statements because their wage statements did not reflect all hours worked as a result of off-the-clock work and premium pay; and (f) failed to timely pay all wages owed upon the termination of employment.<\/p>\n<p>Final Approval was recently granted and settlement checks will be distributed.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\"><strong><u>Contact Us<\/u><\/strong><\/a> if you have any questions.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dcec6d\">\n            Safeway Delivery Driver Case - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dcec6d\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Palatto v. Safeway Inc.<br \/>Alameda County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. RG19020914<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff, on behalf himself and other Delivery Drivers, who worked for Safeway in California allege that they were not paid wages for all working hours, not provided uninterrupted meal breaks, and not timely and properly paid all their wages at time of separation.<\/p>\n<p>This case has settled.\u00a0 Notice will be mailed to eligible class members by March 20, 2025.\u00a0 Please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a> if you do not receive your class notice.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dcece1\">\n             Starbucks - <em> Store Manager Case <\/em><em> <\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dcece1\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Anderson v. Starbucks Corporation<br \/>Northern District of California<br \/>Case No. 20-cv-01178-JD<\/p>\n<p>This case is a putative class action on behalf of Plaintiffs and all other individuals who are or have been employed as Store Managers by Starbucks Corporation, in California. Plaintiffs allege that they were not reimbursed for the reasonable and necessary use of their personal cell phones for work. Plaintiffs seek damages and penalties for the unreimbursed business expenses they incurred for the benefit of Starbucks.<\/p>\n<p><span>This case has settled and settlement checks were mailed to eligible class members on November 20, 2024. The check stale date is March 4, 2025. If you have not received your check, please contact the claims administrator to have your check reissued, <a href=\"mailto:info@starbuckscaliforniasettlement.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">info@starbuckscaliforniasettlement.com<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dced4d\">\n             UBS Financial Services, Inc. - <em> Financial Advisor Case <\/em><em> <\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dced4d\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hutcheson, et al. v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.<br \/>Marin County Superior Court<br \/>Case No. CV0005398<\/p>\n<p><span>Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated UBS Financial Advisors in California who incurred reasonable and necessary business expenses as a result of their performance of duties for UBS, allege that they were not reimbursed for these necessary expenses.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dceddf\">\n             Walgreens Store Manager Case - <em> Overtime Wages Class Action <\/em><em> <\/em>\n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dceddf\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            <em> <\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Aguilar v. Walgreen Co.<br \/>Northern District of California<br \/>Case No. 20-cv-00124<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs were employed as Store Managers at Walgreens in California and allege that they have been misclassified as exempt instead of non-exempt and therefore not paid overtime compensation for all overtime hours worked. Plaintiffs also allege that they have not been provided meal and rest breaks, correct wage statements and were not paid all their wages at time of separation.<\/p>\n<p>If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please <a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/contact\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=&#8221;4.27.3&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;]<\/p>\n<h3>Previous Employment Cases<\/h3>\n<ul class=\"list_2col list_arrows\">\n<li>Activision Blizzard Case &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Aldo &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>American Greetings &amp; Carlton Cards &#8211; <em>Overtime Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Ameriprise &#8211; <em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Ameriquest &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Banc of America &#8211; <em>Broker Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Bank of America &#8211; <em>Mortgage Loan Officer Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Bank of America Small Business Banker &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Boston Market &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Burakoff v. US Bancorp Investments &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>California Pizza &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Carmax &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Century 21 Real Estate &#8211; <em>Century 21 Real Estate Agent Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Chase ABM &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Chase BBO Case &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Chase Investment Services Financial Advisor Case &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Chase RM &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Children&#8217;s Place &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Chuck E. Cheese &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Citibank &#8211; <em>Broker Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Citibank &#8211; <em>Loan Officer Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Coca-Cola &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>David&#8217;s Bridal &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Dawn Food Products Case &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Dollar General Case &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>DS Waters Route Sales Representative Case &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em><\/li>\n<li>EB Games &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Ewing Irrigation &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Fresno Beverage &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Friendly Call &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Galpin Motors &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Hanesbrand &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Hesami v. Community Bank (BRM) &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Hoop Retail Store\/The Disney Store &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Knox &amp; Associates &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>LPL Financial LLC &#8211; <em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Merrill Lynch &#8211; <em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC &#8211; <em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Napa Valley Wine Train Case &#8211; <em>Meal &amp; Rest Break Violations<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Noah&#8217;s Bagels (Einstein) &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Orchard Supply Company LLC (ASM) &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Overton Security Officer Case &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Pac Pizza &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Papyrus &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Piper Jaffray &#8211; <em>Broker Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Pizza Hut I &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Pizza Hut II &#8211; <em>Vacation Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Protiviti &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Pricewaterhousecoopers &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>PVH Case &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em><\/li>\n<li>RLLW, Inc. &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Round Table &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Rubio Arts &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Savaseniorcare &#8211; <em>Meal &amp; Rest Break Violations<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Sav-On &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Save Mart I &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Save Mart II &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. &#8211; <em>FLSA Collective Action for Unpaid Compensation<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Spencer Gifts &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Starving Students &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Taco Bell &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Target &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Team Enterprises Promotional Specialist &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>The Gap &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Trak Auto &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>TripActions Sales Development Representative &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Tully&#8217;s Coffee &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>US Bank BBO Litigation #1 &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>US Bank BBO Litigation #2 &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>US Bank Individual Case &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>US Bank Mortgage Loan Office Case &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Vitamin Shoppe &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>VNS Hotels Case &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Wachovia &#8211; <em>Broker Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Washington Mutual &#8211; <em>Broker Case<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Wells Fargo Loan Officer Case &#8211; <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Wendy&#8217;s &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Westamerica Bank (ACSM) &#8211; <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Current Employment Cases \n    <div class=\"toggle-content-wrapper\">\n        <button class=\"toggle-content-button\" data-target=\"toggle_content_6964859dd7ce7\">\n            Amports - Expense Reimbursement \n        <\/button>\n        <div id=\"toggle_content_6964859dd7ce7\" class=\"toggle-content\" style=\"display: none;\">\n            \n        <\/div>\n    <\/div> Recinos v. Amports, Inc.Contra Costa County Superior CourtCase No. C24-02244 Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees, who have worked for Amports in California allege that they were denied expense reimbursement for the reasonable and necessary use of their personal mobile phones to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"[title type=\"h2\" class=\"tfuse\"]<span style=\"color: #999999;\">Current Employment Cases<\/span>[\/title]\r\n\r\n[toggle_content title=\"Safeway Delivery Driver Case - <em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em><em> <\/em>\" class=\"\"]<em> Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\n<strong>Case Status: CURRENT<\/strong>\r\n\r\nPalatto v. Safeway Inc.\r\nAlameda County Superior Court\r\nCase No. RG19020914\r\n\r\nPlaintiff, on behalf himself and other Delivery Drivers, who worked for Safeway in California allege that they were not paid wages for all working hours, not provided uninterrupted meal breaks, and not timely and properly paid all their wages at time of separation.\r\n\r\nPlease view the documents below for further information about this case:\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/7.8.19.Confomed-FAC.pdf\">First Amended Complaint<\/a>\r\n\r\n<strong>To Join the Class<\/strong>\r\nIn any class action suit, the court stipulates a window of eligibility for participation in the class. If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please contact <a title=\"Ed Wynne\" href=\"mailto:EWynne@wynnelawfirm.com\">Ed Wynne.<\/a>\r\n\r\n[\/toggle_content]\r\n\r\n[toggle_content title=\" Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC - <em> Financial Advisor Case <\/em><em> <\/em>\" class=\"\"]<em> Financial Advisor Case<\/em>\r\n\r\n<strong>Case Status: CURRENT<\/strong>\r\n\r\nHarvey v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC\r\nNorthern District of California\r\nCase No. 18-cv-02835\r\n\r\nPlaintiff, on behalf of himself and other Financial Advisors at Morgan Stanley in California, seeks damages and penalties for unlawful pay deductions, failure to reimburse reasonable and necessary business expenses, and failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements.\r\n\r\nPlease view the documents below for further information about this case:\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Doc-11-FAC.pdf\">First Amended Complaint<\/a>\r\n\r\nIf you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please contact <a title=\"Ed Wynne\" href=\"mailto:EWynne@wynnelawfirm.com\">Ed Wynne.<\/a>\r\n\r\n[\/toggle_content]\r\n\r\n[toggle_content title=\" Starbucks - <em> Store Manager Case <\/em><em> <\/em>\" class=\"\"]<em> Store Manager Case<\/em>\r\n\r\n<strong>Case Status: CURRENT<\/strong>\r\n\r\nAnderson v. Starbucks Corporation\r\nNorthern District of California\r\nCase No. 20-cv-01178-JD\r\n\r\nThis case is a putative class action on behalf of Plaintiffs and all other individuals who are or have been employed as Store Managers by Starbucks Corporation, in California. Plaintiffs allege that they were not reimbursed for the reasonable and necessary use of their personal cell phones for work. Plaintiffs seek damages and penalties for the unreimbursed business expenses they incurred for the benefit of Starbucks.\r\n\r\nPlease view the documents below for further information about this case:\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/10.17.19.Conformed-FAC.pdf\">First Amended Complaint<\/a>\r\n\r\nIf you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please contact <a title=\"Ed Wynne\" href=\"mailto:EWynne@wynnelawfirm.com\">Ed Wynne.<\/a>\r\n\r\n[\/toggle_content]\r\n\r\n[toggle_content title=\" Team Enterprises Promotional Specialist Case - <em> Overtime Wages Class Action <\/em><em> <\/em>\" class=\"\"]<em> Overtime Wages Class Action <\/em>\r\n\r\n<strong>Case Status: CURRENT<\/strong>\r\n\r\nCipolla v. Team Enterprises, LLC\r\nNorthern District of California\r\nCase No. 3:18-cv-06867\r\n\r\nPlaintiffs, and other Promotional Specialists, who worked for Team Enterprises nationwide allege they were denied overtime compensation and other wages in violation of California and federal labor laws.\r\n\r\nPlease view the documents below for further information about this case:\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Doc-1.Complaint.pdf\">Complaint<\/a>\r\n\r\nIf you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please contact <a title=\"Ed Wynne\" href=\"mailto:EWynne@wynnelawfirm.com\">Ed Wynne.<\/a>\r\n\r\n[\/toggle_content]\r\n\r\n[toggle_content title=\" UBS Financial Services, Inc. - <em> Financial Advisor Case <\/em><em> <\/em>\" class=\"\"]<em> Financial Advisor Case<\/em>\r\n\r\n<strong>Case Status: CURRENT<\/strong>\r\n\r\nHutcheson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.\r\nAlameda County Superior Court\r\nCase No. RG19008003\r\n\r\nPlaintiff, on behalf of himself and other Financial Advisors at UBS in California, seeks penalties for unlawful pay deductions, failure to reimburse reasonable and necessary business expenses, and failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements.\r\n\r\nPlease view the documents below for further information about this case:\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2.22.19.Hutcheson-Complaint.pdf\">Complaint<\/a>\r\n\r\nIf you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please contact <a title=\"Ed Wynne\" href=\"mailto:EWynne@wynnelawfirm.com\">Ed Wynne.<\/a>\r\n\r\n[\/toggle_content]\r\n\r\n[toggle_content title=\" Walgreens Store Manager Case (Aguilar)- <em> Overtime Wages Class Action <\/em><em> <\/em>\" class=\"\"]<em> Overtime Wages Class Action <\/em>\r\n\r\n<strong>Case Status: CURRENT<\/strong>\r\n\r\nAguilar v. Walgreen Co.\r\nNorthern District of California\r\nCase No. 20-cv-00124\r\n\r\nPlaintiffs were employed as Store Managers at Walgreens in California and allege that they have been misclassified as exempt instead of non-exempt and therefore not paid overtime compensation for all overtime hours worked. Plaintiffs also allege that they have not been provided meal and rest breaks, correct wage statements and were not paid all their wages at time of separation.\r\n\r\nPlease view the documents below for further information about this case:\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/191204-Aguilar-v-Walgreen-Complaint-cfm.pdf\">Complaint<\/a>\r\n\r\nIf you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this suit, please contact <a title=\"Ed Wynne\" href=\"mailto:EWynne@wynnelawfirm.com\">Ed Wynne.<\/a>\r\n\r\n[\/toggle_content]\r\n\r\n[title type=\"h2\" class=\"tfuse\"]<span style=\"color: #999999;\">Closed Employment Cases<\/span>[\/title]\r\n\r\nActivision Blizzard Case -<em>\u00a0Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nAldo-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nAmerican Greetings &amp; Carlton Cards -\u00a0<em>Overtime Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nAmeriprise - <em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nAmeriquest-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nBanc of America-<em> Broker Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nBank of America -\u00a0<em>Mortgage Loa Office Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nBank of America Small Business Banker -\u00a0<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nBoston Market-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nBurakoff v. US Bancorp Investments-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nCalifornia Pizza-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nCarmax-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nCentury 21 Real Estate -\u00a0<em>Century 21 Real Estate Agent Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nChase ABM -\u00a0<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nChase BBO Case-<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nChase Investment Services Financial Advisor Case-<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nChase RM -\u00a0<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nChildren's Place-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nChuck E. Cheese-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nCitibank-<em> Broker Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nCitibank -\u00a0<em>Loan Officer Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nCoca-Cola-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nDavid's Bridal-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nDawn Food Products Case -<em>\u00a0Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nDollar General Case -<em>\u00a0Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nDS Waters Route Sales Representative Case-<em>\u00a0Wage &amp; Hour<\/em>\r\n\r\n<em><\/em>EB Games-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nEwing Irrigation-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nFresno Beverage-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nFriendly Call -<em>\u00a0Wage &amp; Hour<\/em>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">Galpin Motors-<\/span><em style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\"> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">\r\n<\/span>\r\n\r\nHanesbrand-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nHesami v. Community Bank (BRM) -\u00a0<em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em>\r\n\r\nHoop Retail Store\/The Disney Store-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nKnox &amp; Associates-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nLPL Financial LLC -\u00a0<em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nMerrill Lynch -\u00a0<em>Financial Advisor Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nNapa Valley Wine Train Case -\u00a0<em>Meal &amp; Rest Break Violations<\/em>\r\n\r\nNoah's Bagels (Einstein)-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nOrchard Supply Company LLC (ASM) - <em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nOverton Security Officer Case-<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nPac Pizza-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nPapyrus-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nPiper Jaffray-<em> Broker Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nPizza Hut I-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nPizza Hut II-<em> Vacation Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nProtiviti-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nPricewaterhousecoopers -<em>\u00a0Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nPVH Case-<em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em>\r\n\r\nRLLW, Inc.-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nRound Table-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nRubio Arts-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nSavaseniorcare -\u00a0<em>Meal &amp; Rest Break Violations<\/em>\r\n\r\nSav-On-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nSave Mart I-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nSave Mart II-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nShurgard Storage Centers, Inc.-<em> FLSA Collective Action for Unpaid Compensation<\/em>\r\n\r\nSpencer Gifts-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nStarving Students-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nTaco Bell-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nTarget-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nThe Gap-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nTrak Auto-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nTripActions Sales Development Representative -\u00a0<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nTully's Coffee-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nUS Bank BBO Litigation #1-<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\"\r\n\r\nUS Bank BBO Litigation #2-<em>\u00a0Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nUS Bank Individual Case-<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nUS Bank Mortgage Loan Office Case-<em>Wage &amp; Hour<\/em>\r\n\r\nVitamin Shoppe-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nVNS Hotels Case-<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nWachovia-<em> Broker Case <\/em>\r\n\r\nWashington Mutual-<em> Broker Case<\/em>\r\n\r\nWells Fargo Loan Officer Case -\u00a0<em>Wage &amp; Hour Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nWendy's-<em> Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>\r\n\r\nWestamerica Bank (ACSM) -\u00a0<em>Overtime Wages Class Action<\/em>","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-728","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=728"}],"version-history":[{"count":110,"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1659,"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728\/revisions\/1659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wynnelawfirm.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}